Location: Course feedback 2009

Discussion: Virtual RealityReported This is a featured thread

Showing 1 post

Posted Anonymously
Virtual Reality
Jul 17 2009, 12:03 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 17 2009, 12:03 PM EDT
I found the course lacked structure that I would expect at university, the content itself was very exciting, but it required alot of self teaching as by week 6-7 we were only just learning about creating a door, where as I would expect to be at a much more advanced stage, it would of also been nice to include some tutorials on import sculpted prims into second life as nearly everyone struggled with this.

Finally I found the marking to be quite inconsistent, I know of people who put in much greater work than other team members, producing better work as a result, and yet getting lower grades. This is on top of a demo session that never occured so people could not demonstrate there work only to be told that it had occured 3 weeks earlier, without there knowledge despite being in the lab for the entire session.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None (edit keyword tags)

Be the first to reply.